Photography: I don’t – Shot on Kodak Tri-X 400 at EI 400 (435mm)

I don’t

Shot on Kodak Tri-X 400 at EI 400
Black and white negative film in 35mm format
Overdeveloped two stops (N+2)

Read the Kodak Tri-X 400 review here.
…and don’t forget about the Tri-X 400 push processing guide!


I don't - Shot on Kodak Tri-X 400 at EI 400. Black and white negative film in 35mm format.
I don’t

Shot on Kodak Tri-X 400 at EI 400.

Black and white negative film in 35mm format.



Share your knowledge, story or project

At the heart of EMULSIVE is the concept of helping promote the transfer of knowledge across the film photography community. You can support this goal by contributing your thoughts, work, experiences and ideas to inspire the hundreds of thousands of people who read these pages each month. Check out the submission guide here.

If you like what you're reading you can also help this personal passion project by heading on over to the EMULSIVE Patreon page and giving as little as a dollar a month. There's also print and apparel over at Society 6, currently showcasing over two dozen t-shirt designs and over a dozen unique photographs available for purchase.



I'm EM, founder, overlord and editor-in-chief here at, as well as all-round benevolent gestalt entity. Contrary to popular belief, I am not an AI.

Related reading


  1. This is a cool thing to find and take a picture of.
    Details of photo capture and development confuse me. Photo looks underexposed on purpose. So why to push process 2 stops? It says exposed at 400 EI. OK so you developed in chemicals as if it was shot at 100 or 1600? Looks like shot at 800 and develop normal to me. Of course I am often fooled. LOL

    • This one is an overdevelopment of two stops, so I should have used that instead of “push processed” in this case – even though the physical method is identical! Anyway, the description should reflect that and I’ve just updated it. Thanks for lending me your eagle eye, Larry.

Join the discussion