First of all a disclaimer; I am not affiliated with ADOX, nobody paid me to write this and I’m just doing this review because I think it might be of interest to some people. Here goes.

What I like about analog photography is the fact that there are countless old and new cameras available to choose from; and each enables you to capture the world in a slightly different way. It takes time to get used to a new camera, even if you’re simply adding another in the same format as you’ve already been using.

Additionally there so many films that not only differ in speed but also offer black and white, color negative and color slide options. If stuck creatively, what I like to do is switch things up a bit. It’s easy to get in a rut and to the same things over and over again. And as a photographer, be it amateur or professional, I believe it’s important that you keep progressing with your photography.

Here’s what I cover in this review:

Creatively stuck


I found myself in such a situation and wasn’t feeling too hot about photography anymore. So I went out and bought a couple of rolls of ADOX SILVERMAX film. It’s a 100 speed film, which is quite different from my usual Kodak Tri-X 400.

I used to develop Kodak Tri-X in Rodinal and as you guys probably know, it yields very grainy results which is especially noticeable with 35mm film. With summer approaching, I thought a film with an ISO of 100 might be the way to go. If the sun is out you don’t even need a tripod (in most cases).

ADOX SILVERMAX – Starry Night 

Choosing ADOX Silvermax 100

So why did I choose this film and not say, Ilford FP4+ or some other ISO 100 film? Well, I have to admit I was influenced by the marketing. ADOX say that SILVERMAX has an increased silver-content and can render 14 zones of latitude. The kicker is that in order to get the maximum out of the film you are urged to use the SILVERMAX developer.

For ‘normal’ results ADOX say that you can use any developer. Now I’m no chemist or engineer, so I didn’t get into my laboratory and check the amount of silver is on the film, or whether it can actually render 14 zones – I simply went out and took some pictures.

ADOX SILVERMAX - Sturmreiter
ADOX SILVERMAX – Sturmreiter

The image above is ‘Sturmreiter’. I used a Minolta XD7 with a 50mm f/1.4 and a cheap red-filter. I have a Canon Scanner and it’s not the best as you can see with the scans, but I think it’s sufficient for this illustration.

Anyway, the image below shows the biker and tree at 100% crop and the ‘sharpness’ is pretty good.

ADOX SILVERMAX - Sturmreiter (detail)
ADOX SILVERMAX – Sturmreiter (detail)

I’ve also made a print and I quite like how it turned out!

ADOX SILVERMAX - Sturmreiter (print)
ADOX SILVERMAX – Sturmreiter (print)

The next image, ‘Storm’ was also handled pretty well by the film.

The sky was pretty bright in the lower right-hand corner and parts of the trees are relatively dark, but there is detail in both areas and I’ve found that SILVERMAX prints very well.

I overexpose the images just a bit and it works perfectly with medium-contrast paper.


I underexposed ‘Storm 2’ a bit because I metered incorrectly, but as you can see the detail in the trees is alright and still sufficient for a print.

I actually cropped this image but since it is a 100 speed film it is not too grainy and you get some latitude for later framing in the darkroom.


The final image below, ‘Festung’ was shot at f/2. I don’t know why but I think the background is slightly out of focus. The prints I made are not that large so you actually don’t even notice it.

What I really love about this film is its rendition of the lighter and darker areas. If your exposure is anywhere near the optimum you’ll have detail in both.



So what’s the verdict?

Do I like this film? Yes!
Will I continue using this film? Yes!
Would I recommend it to friends and family? Yes!

I have to be honest though: I’ve shot both Agfa APX100 and ILFORD FP4 PLUS and if I was to put three images on the wall, one from each film, I don’t think I could tell you which film is which. You probably could go about and take a loupe or get a hi-res scan and analyze the pictures to death but I’m not that kind of guy.

I went out a couple of times and photographed some trees in stormy weather and this new film didn’t let me down, so I’m happy. If you’re thinking of buying this film or any other new kind of film I urge you to get out of your comfort zone and just try it.

At the end of the day, it’s not silver content or some other feature that’s important; it’s that you get back out there and start shooting.

~ Christopher

Share your knowledge, story or project

The transfer of knowledge across the film photography community is the heart of EMULSIVE. You can add your support by contributing your thoughts, work, experiences and ideas to inspire the hundreds of thousands of people who read these pages each month. Check out the submission guide here.

If you like what you're reading you can also help this passion project by heading over to the EMULSIVE Patreon page and contributing as little as a dollar a month. There's also print and apparel over at Society 6, currently showcasing over two dozen t-shirt designs and over a dozen unique photographs available for purchase.

About the author

Avatar - Christopher Schmidtke

Christopher Schmidtke

I love taking photographs of people. On film. Yes, they still make film. For all the gear-nerds out there, I use an old Mamiya RB67 medium format camera and a Minolta XD7 for 35mm. I live in Würzburg, Germany and if you want to make some images or have...

, and please make sure you also check out their website here.

Join the Conversation



This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  1. Fantastic film. I soup it in HC-110 with great results. If it came in other formats it would be my main 100 speed film.

  2. I developed w/ Rodinal then got the dedicated Silvermax developer & the results are much better. I won’t get any more, though, because it’s too similar to others I can develop in Rodinal and mostly because it curls up too much & therefore makes scanning more boring than it should be.

  3. Nice shots Christopher. Did you develop in Silvermax or something else? (sorry if you specified that – I must have missed it.) I just ran a roll developed in HC-10 and quite liked it. Looks a lot like Tmax to me, but I like the dead clear base. I’ll shoot it again.

  4. AS far as I know, Silverman is the result of Adox long endeavor to create a “real” successor to AGFA APX100. Hence the similarity. 😉

  5. Very good review. Thank you. I get it that it’s very similar to Agfa APX100. One huge advantage of Silvermax is that it’s available in 100ft rolls. This cuts the costs of a 36exp roll in half, to maybe $3.50.

  6. Great review and images, i agree with you that its a fine film to work with. I shoot the past time 3 test film silvermqx and was very pleased with the result i.e. Development in the Adox silvermax developer. So again bougt new film and waiting for some winter weather to do more experience with this amazing film.

  7. It’s a lovely film, agree simerlar in ‘feel’ to FP4+ must get some more and try with their dev.