Kodak T-MAX 100 is undoubtedly the film I prefer after Tri-X 400 but despite this T-Grain appreciation, I have never been able to fully appreciate T-MAX 400. Although on paper it could replace Tri-X for my 35mm photography, I still find the old queen unbeatable amongst ISO 400 black and white emulsions.
Tri-X 400 has been my favourite film stock since the beginning of the 1980s, despite the fact that at that time I was constantly in search of no-grain/low-grain films. Nowadays, with the dominance of unnaturally sharp digital images, I have learned to appreciate the grain of classical films even though I am still fascinated by the sharpness delivered by new technology films such as T-MAX 100.
Living two these two passions at the same time is not easy but I have found a place of balance by taking both traditional grain and T-grain emulsion photographs during my portrait sessions.
Wanting to give T-MAX 400 another chance at my leaderboard, I purchased a few rolls and began testing…
Returning to T-MAX 400…
My first rolls were shot at box speed and processed in Microphen for 9 minutes at 20°C with my usual agitation scheme of two inversions every three minutes. I choose Microphen not for any particular reason other than it is the developer I normally use for high sensitivity films and above all for push processing.
The results were really below my expectations. In truth, I expected negatives similar to T-MAX 100 even if with more grain. I should state that I have always exposed T-MAX 100 at box speed.
After Microphen, I made a second attempt with Rodinal, the developer I have been using for low sensitivity films over the past four years. Again, I stuck with my usual agitation scheme (above) and dilution – 1+25 for 9 minutes at 20°C.
Rodinal delivered more “personality” in my negatives, however, it did not produce the desired effect: making me scream like a teenage girl.
Still having some rolls to use, I paused my shooting and began to browse the net trying to understand how others develop T-MAX 400 and found some nice images with good shades of gray and acceptable details in the blacks.
Some I particularly enjoyed were developed using Kodak HC-110, others with D76, a few with T-MAX developer. It was then I remembered good old D76, a developer I used intensively from the late 1970s up to the 1990s.
…and finally, it was with the help of D76 that I got some nice negatives from T-MAX 400. Although I must say that they were slightly underdeveloped: I will increase the time slightly with the next roll.
Here are a few shots from that roll, exposed at EI 400 and developed in D76 stock for 10 minutes at 20°C with two inversions every three minutes. They were all taken with my old Canon EOS 500N and an EF 50mm f/1.8 STM except the last, which was taken with my EF 40mm f/2.8 STM wide open.
Up to this point, T-MAX 400 was giving me what I felt were conflicting results. I felt puzzled because it wasn’t always giving me the range of grays I had come to expect through my research.
Perhaps this was because of having Tri-X as my reference for ISO 400 film stocks or perhaps I have not yet found the correct development scheme to squeeze the best from the emulsion.
An unexpected twist
A change in my attitude towards the film came following my daughter’s dance recital, held at a local theatre. I had been informed that I would not be allowed to photograph during the event; so only I took along the gear necessary to capture a couple of outdoor shots: a Canon EOS 33 with EF 85mm f/1.8 USM lens. I loaded a roll of ILFORD FP4 PLUS and took along an extra roll of T-MAX 400 because you never know, sometimes a high sensitivity film can sometimes save the day!
That’s exactly what happened…
Entering the venue I saw many people with cameras and big lenses. An announcement made it clear that the photography prohibition was limited to the use of flash and not to taking photographs. Well, I pulled out the Canon and quickly took a light reading of the stage.
I would need to expose the film at EI 3200 to obtain a shutter speed high enough to freeze “my ballerina” and remembered having seen several examples of T-MAX 400 pushed 3 stops, so I did! I took only a few frames that I, of course, processed later in Microphen – 15 minutes at 20°C.
I was very pleasantly surprised with the results of which I share two frames below.
The scene was very contrasty and my exposure was based on a spot reading on the pink ballerina outfits. In addition, I was a quite far from the stage and was only able to use my 85mm lens, so the pictures are cropped but I am really happy with the images and feel that they speak for themselves.
Developing my relationship with T-MAX 400
All this goes to say that at box speed, Kodak T-MAX 400 isn’t really my cup of tea – yet.
I prefer much more “grainy” ISO 400 films such as Tri-X 400, ILFORD HP5 PLUS (especially pushed a bit) and Foma Retropan 320 and my initial dissatisfaction with T-MAX 400 was based on a deception of my own making, I was mistakenly expecting to be able to compare it with Tri-X and expect similar outcome – obviously not the case.
Based on the results you see here – my T-MAX 400 journey, if you will – I will definitely be pushing T-MAX 400 again and very probably, I will try it for some ambient light portraits… maybe even at box speed as well!
As ever, there is a long road ahead, filled with many more experiments, surprises and maybe one day, a place on my favourite film stock leaderboard.
Write for EMULSIVE
EMULSIVE is all about knowledge transfer and developing more of it across the film photography community.
Help by contributing your thoughts, work and ideas to inspire others reading these pages: read this quick submission guide.
Lend your support
If you like what you’re reading you can help support EMULSIVE by heading on over to the EMULSIVE Patreon page and adding financial support from as little as $2 a month. As if that’s not enough, there’s also an EMULSIVE print and apparel store over at Society 6, currently showcasing over two dozen t-shirt designs and over a dozen unique photographs available for purchase.