When it comes to print film we all have our favorites, be it for aesthetics, latitude, how they handle some (intentional) abuse (over/underexposure, pushing, pulling), e.t.c. And I have narrowed down my list to Kodak Ektar 100, Kodak Ultramax 400 and CineStill 800T as, from my own experience and preferences this specific trio covers all lighting scenarios I enjoy making photos in with consistent results.

With Kodak’s prices on the rise and the limited availability of many film stocks both in quantity and variety here in Lisbon, Portugal led me to Lomography CN 400 and to see if and how I could integrate it into work or even better if it could replace any of my current go-to film stocks.

My initial goal was to replace Kodak Ektar, as it is the second most expensive film stock from my shortlist and I can’t really get the look I get with CineStill with anything else I’ve tried. How did that go? I ended up replacing Kodak Ultramax.

I can confidently shoot Kodak’s Ektar at box speed (EI 100), pushed one stop (EI 200) and pushed two stops (EI 400) and know what to expect from it. The same goes for Kodak Ultramax as I’ve made photos I’m pleased with what I get from exposing it at 100, 200, 400, 800 and even all the way up to 1600 (pushing it in development as I go above box speed). Finally, CineStill 800T allows me to make photos during daytime exposing it at 400 (with an 85B filter), 800 and 1600 (pushing it one stop in development).

I imagine you can see a few similarities emerging here. In a word: – “Flexibility” – I can overexpose them, push them in development as per my needs, have decently looking (or “workable”) skin tones, contrast and saturation that work well for my needs and personal tastes.

Lomography’s CN 400 fit like a glove where I once held Kodak Ultramax, for cheaper and also with the option of buying it in packs of 3. Overexposing it by one stop (EI 200 – no adjustment in development times) I’d say yields better results than Kodak Ultramax in similar conditions. It tends to lean more to the cooler side than Kodak’s offering without any overpowering color shifts or cast.

Soon I hope to can share other sets of “5 Frames…” showing my results exposing it at EI 400 and EI 800.

~ Miguel

Submit your 5 Frames... today

Get your own 5 Frames featured by submitting your article using this form or by sending an email via the contact link at the top of the page.

Share your knowledge, story or project

The transfer of knowledge across the film photography community is the heart of EMULSIVE. You can add your support by contributing your thoughts, work, experiences and ideas to inspire the hundreds of thousands of people who read these pages each month. Check out the submission guide here.

If you like what you're reading you can also help this passion project by heading over to the EMULSIVE Patreon page and contributing as little as a dollar a month. There's also print and apparel over at Society 6, currently showcasing over two dozen t-shirt designs and over a dozen unique photographs available for purchase.

About the author

Avatar - Miguel Melo

Miguel Melo

Lisbon based software engineer, (hobbyist) photographer working on too many projects all at once.


Join the Conversation

1 Comment


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  1. Hiiii Miguel : thank you so much. Very great, like the colors and rendering. I will try this film. Thank so much for the sharing. Very good pictures.