I asked opinions about pushing consumer color films like Kodak Pro Image 100 in one of my local forums but most people said it is not worth pushing them because those are “just” regular consumer films. Anyway, I decided to experiment myself and see if I liked how things turned out. Instead of using Kodak Pro Image 100, I used Fujicolor C200 because online reviews said it has a colder tone and richer greens than the former. Other than that, to make things interesting I push processed two stops instead of one.

For this experiment, I shot the roll during a trip to Ipoh, a rich historical city that’s filled with oversaturated markets of chicken rice and white coffee.

I tried to overexpose my scenes by one stop as I understand color film tend to be less forgiving than black and white film in term of exposure latitude (correct me if I am wrong). To be honest, I had zero expectations on how the end result would look and I was worried things may not turn out how I expected. Would I overexpose them too much? Would the images become too grainy and ruin the details?

I put my worries aside and sent the film to be developed by Darkroom8 the day after I came back from the trip. After enduring a depressing week, I can say the results came out better than I thought!

Of course, grain is present but that is just the character of pushing film. Although I tried to overexpose the scenes by a stop I noticed the presence of grain is “rougher” and some details are lost if there was not enough light for the film to “soak in”. The fourth frame of the table and chairs is a good example.

After pushing, the color remains rich and natural, and the film seems to perform best when enough light is present. As for sharpness, it is not its strong point (!) but for a consumer film, I will not hesitate to use it on my next trip and push it again.

Overall I like Fujicolor C200 more than the Kodak Pro Image 100, as the former renders a richer green and a more balanced skin tone, while the latter leans to a more yellowish tone that I am not a fan of.

Conclusion: it is worth push processing consumer? After a simple experiment, I would say yes.

But, for the rest, it simply a matter of preference.

~ Kevin

Submit your 5 Frames... today

Get your own 5 Frames featured by submitting your article using this form or by sending an email via the contact link at the top of the page.

Share your knowledge, story or project

The transfer of knowledge across the film photography community is the heart of EMULSIVE. You can add your support by contributing your thoughts, work, experiences and ideas to inspire the hundreds of thousands of people who read these pages each month. Check out the submission guide here.

If you like what you're reading you can also help this passion project by heading over to the EMULSIVE Patreon page and contributing as little as a dollar a month. There's also print and apparel over at Society 6, currently showcasing over two dozen t-shirt designs and over a dozen unique photographs available for purchase.

About the author

Avatar - Kevin Tan

Kevin Tan

International Relation graduates. Joined film photography since May 2018. Loves photography and reading. Currently working in customer service. From Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia


Join the Conversation



This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  1. Please learn some basic terminology first and then be clear about what you specifically did. From what you are writing, one can only guess what the procedure was (overexposed 1 stop but rated ISO 800 and push processed accordingly, meaning treated as ISO 50 in development? Result would then be +1 Stop Push with +1 Stop overdevelopment)

  2. I’m guessing you pushed the development by two stops but actually exposed it as though it were ISO 400?
    I like the effect. I’ve used C200 before. It’s a nice film, but pushing does seem to take it to another level in terms of contrast and acutance.

  3. Sorry, I’m a bit confused. You over exposed by one stop and you push processed by another two stops? Is that a total of three stops over exposed? How does that work?

  4. Umm… If you’ve pushed it to 800, that’s underexposure isn’t it? Overexposing by 2 stops would be treating it as a slow 50 film.