There are so many articles extolling the virtues of the Hasselblad XPan that when I was recently offered the chance to borrow one for a few days I leapt at the opportunity.

There were plenty of 35mm panoramic cameras made, some mask part of the frame, like Ricoh R1 (I’ve got one, bought it new 30 years ago, now I call it “the light leaker”) which shoots both a standard 24x36mm frame along with a 12x36mm ‘panoramic’ frame.

Then there are cameras like the Horizont, a swing lens camera deigned and built in the Former Soviet Union. There’s a contemporary Lomo version as well. As the name suggests, the lens swings across the film, giving a 24×58mm frame.

Hasselblad, being Hasselblad, did things differently. The first thing they did was outsource the job to Fuji, who released the same camera for the Japanese market as the TX-1. The internet being what it is, you can find articles telling you that the Hasselblad is the superior camera and others arguing for the Fuji. Having only shot the ‘Blad, I’m not taking sides.

The camera shoots both a standard 24x36mm frame and also a 24x65mm ‘true’ panoramic frame, resulting in an almost medium format sized negative. A regular roll of 36 exposures will result in 36 standard frames or 21 panoramic images – or some combination of the two, as you can switch back & forth as you feel like it.

Like lots of film cameras, especially those made in smaller numbers, or with unusual features, the XPan has jumped in price in recent years and there are currently a few listed in eBay from A$7,000 (around US$5,000) and up. 

When an Instagram buddy of mine posted a pic of his XPan, as I’ve never used one before (I’d probably never seen one in the flesh until I picked it up) I messaged asking if I could borrow. “No problem” was the reply, and a few days later I collected the camera. Thanks again, Danny!

My first impression was that it’s big for a 35mm camera, although at about 1kg not heavy (but I also shoot a Nikon F4)

Just like my Ricoh R1 when you load the camera all the film is pulled out of the cassette, then wound back in after each exposure – something to do with not fogging/ruining the exposed film if you open the back by mistake.

The ergonomics are excellent – despite it’s size, it’s easy to handle and one-handed operation wasn’t an issue. As you’d expect on something branded Hasselblad the lens – this one has the 45mm – was brilliant, although the lens shade had to be taken off to take off or put back on to get the lens cap on or off, which seems a bit of a crap design/an oversight.

And it’s just a pleasure to shoot with. It’s quiet, the focus throw is short enough that it’s quite quick, and despite viewfinder patch moving around a little as you focus, it’s easy enough to pin focus.

Pros: Cinematic! Panoramic! Choose your own adjective, but the wider frame can turn a very mundane image into something quite exciting.

Despite it’s size, it’s a camera you could carry all day without it getting in your way.

Cons: I believe it’s all electric, so a dead battery means an unhappy photographer, and I’d be concerned if something went wrong: it’s one thing to fix a 60 year old fully manual camera, it’s another to repair 25 year old electrics.

I blasted through 6 rolls in the few days I had the camera, mainly Kodak Tri-X 400, a roll of Cinestill (wasted) and some Fuji Velvia that I was lucky enough to shoot on a sunny winter day, outside of Melbourne in the  countryside, just before our Lockdown 2.0 started.

Lots of fun to shoot with, but I don’t think I’d buy one, it’s a bit of a one trick pony, but a it’s still a very pretty pony.

~ Nick

Submit your 5 Frames... today

Get your own 5 Frames featured by submitting your article using this form or by sending an email via the contact link at the top of the page.

Share your knowledge, story or project

The transfer of knowledge across the film photography community is the heart of EMULSIVE. You can add your support by contributing your thoughts, work, experiences and ideas to inspire the hundreds of thousands of people who read these pages each month. Check out the submission guide here.

If you like what you're reading you can also help this passion project by heading over to the EMULSIVE Patreon page and contributing as little as a dollar a month. There's also print and apparel over at Society 6, currently showcasing over two dozen t-shirt designs and over a dozen unique photographs available for purchase.

Nick Orloff

Shooting film on and off since I was 13 (I'm now 55) and happily playing with digital as well.

Join the Conversation

4 Comments

 

  1. I have the xpan camera long time. Now in the digital world i use a Leica M10 Monochrom with a 15mm Voigtländer Super Wide Heliar. I shoot only in F11. Then i crop the Result in panorama 7864 x 2828 Pixel (2,78 Xpan Format). The new Leica Black and white Sensor has 40 Megapixel and in panorama you have a 15-20 MP-file. It looks like the same as a black and white Hasselblad Xpan Panorama Picture. I´m so happy with that result.

    http://www.flickr.com/
    search me unter my Name “Tomso M.”

  2. Stan’s right. One trick? Oh, like a Pentax 67? A monochrome M? A plate camera?
    I’ve had an XPan II from new, 2003. This is no pony, it’s a thoroughbred.

  3. Right. I agree as I really wanted one when they were new, but I gave in to the internal argument which is the believing in the panoramic. One needs to be in love with the panoramic. Some are, I appreciate that and I like panoramic when done well, but it’s not in my bones. The camera itself is magnificent. Beautifully made, but so was the Contax G2 of which I opted for at the time. Good article, thanks!

  4. a dead battery (batteries, it uses 2) is a non-issue, same as it is for every other battery powered camera…. why would it make you sad?
    Also what exactly is the ‘one trick’ this one trick pony does? Do you mean shooting panoramic images? The ability to switch formats?