Since I started shooting film 2 years ago, I have wanted to shoot Motion Picture Stock and have it processed in its native ECN-2 chemistry. I’d shot a tonne of CineStill in the past and was feeling jaded that my pictures had a similar look and feel to everyone else’s (and that halation!). Then, after months of searching for a lab that could process ECN-2 I came across Quiet We’re Dreaming lab in Philly who sell and process cine stock in ECN-2. Happy days!

I immediately bought 5 rolls of both the high-speed tungsten stock (VISION3 500T 5219) and the saturated daylight sister, (VISION3 250D 5207) – which has since become my favourite stock ever – and shot the 500T at EI 1600. As a (mostly) night photographer, descriptions like “cinematic” and “Blade Runner vibes” (ugh) get used often when shooting with strong artificial light – particularly neon, so I was really curious to see how the shots would compare and whether they would indeed look like a motion picture still.

Shooting at EI 1600 and asking QWD Lab to push process it 2 stops meant I could walk around nearby suburbs shooting hand-held with my Nikon FA and 50mm f/1.4 lens with no motion blur or issues.

The first thing I noticed when the scans came into my inbox was how low the contrast of Kodak VISION3 500T film naturally is and how cool and blue/purple the main tones are. It’s meant to be graded to your personal taste, but honestly, I was thrilled with the look as is. I made some minor adjustments in Lightroom – mostly bumping contrast, shadows and the highlights but left the scans mostly as they came.

I have since done some major colour grading on a few photos, but I keep coming back to the original scans.

The difference between processing these stocks in C-41 (effectively cross-processing) and developing in ECN-2 is immense! Next time I will definitely overexpose a stop and see what the 500T can do with overexposure.

~ Adam

Submit your 5 Frames... today

Get your own 5 Frames featured by submitting your article using this form or by sending an email via the contact link at the top of the page.

Share your knowledge, story or project

The transfer of knowledge across the film photography community is the heart of EMULSIVE. You can add your support by contributing your thoughts, work, experiences and ideas to inspire the hundreds of thousands of people who read these pages each month. Check out the submission guide here.

If you like what you're reading you can also help this passion project by heading over to the EMULSIVE Patreon page and contributing as little as a dollar a month. There's also print and apparel over at Society 6, currently showcasing over two dozen t-shirt designs and over a dozen unique photographs available for purchase.

About the author

Avatar - Adam Carl

Adam Carl

I'm an environmental scientist during the day but a low-light/night photographer shooting the suburbs and vintage signs on film outside of the 9-5 hours.


Join the Conversation



This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  1. That’s correct, Cinestill is awful except if you like its “Chinatown effect”. Removing the Remjet layer was a fatal error that causes glow and promote static discharges.
    Kodak VISION3 500T is the good candidate to replace the defunct Ektachrome 320T for night and interior scenes.
    There are more and more labs developing films using the ECN-2 process.