Select Page

Review: CineStill Df96 Monobath developer – by Stephen SchaubReview: CineStill Df96 Monobath developer – by Stephen Schaub

Review: CineStill Df96 Monobath developer – by Stephen Schaub

Anyone who knows me knows that I am a fierce advocate for film. Working for the last three decades as both a photographic artist and teacher, I’ve done countless film tests in the interest of maximizing the materials at hand, for both myself and my students, always in pursuit of a better method. I was excited to hear about the introduction of Cinestill’s Df96 Mono Bath Developer, and after working with it extensively I am now decidedly a fan.

Mono bath developers in the hybrid workflow bring ease of process, negatives that scan with little effort and an introduction of film to the next generation without all the baggage of traditional film testing and trial and error. In this series of articles, I go through step by step, introduce myself and explain what CineStill Mono Bath is, how it works, why I use it, and how to use it for optimum results.

This is a mixed media article, comprising of text, images, audio and video talking about monobath developers, specifically Cinestill’s Df96 and how it works with a bunch of films.



Introduction (01:24)

This brief audio intro provides a breakdown of the various parts of this review, from Who is Stephen Schaub? to Conclusions on Df96 monobath developing.



Who is Stephen Schaub? (05:06)

A brief audio overview of my background working in the hybrid process: using traditional film in combination with scanning and printing technology.

I started Figital Revolution to document my switch from a traditional to hybrid process and have spent years finding the best, most effective developer for reliable scanning.



What is a monobath developer? (04:25)

A brief audio explanation of the many benefits of monobath developers. Monobath developers are not new, although recent developments may have you thinking that way. They’re simple to use and combine all of the separate development steps in a traditional darkroom process: developer, stop and fix in one chemical. In short:

There is one chemical only, which allows different films to be processed together. The development process is controlled through both agitation schemes and development time.



Processing techniques (05:53)

This video details step by step the use of Cinestill Df96 monobath. In the video, I discuss:

  • The best agitation method?
  • Maintaining precision temperature and minimizing variability.
  • How to easily keep and reuse monobath.



Tips and tricks with Cinestill Df96 (02:42)

This video follows up on Processing techniques above with helpful specifics on getting the most out of your monobath developer, from confirming your monobath usability to extending its life.



Processing – breaking down the PDF instructions (11:30)

Understanding the instructions created by Cinestill for Df96 is crucial. This concise guide breaks down the processing instructions and discusses:

  • Pushing and pulling specific film brands.
  • Dialling in your ideal negative.
  • Films that require more processing time – and why.



How much does it cost? (04:56)

This audio segment compares Cinestill Df96 monobath developer to FF No.1, and breaks differences down into grain subtleties, as well as dollars and cents (that all important cost per roll).



Sample images



Conclusion (03:32)

This quick audio summation pulls it all together. From processing to final product, why choose Df96 monobath?

In short, it’s easy to use, economical and great for scanning: a great go-to developer.

Thanks for reading, watching and listening.

If you’d like to keep all the videos above in a single place, please add this YouTube playlist. I’d be interested to hear about your experiences with Df96 and any comments you might have on this article. Just leave a note in the comments section below.

~ Stephen Schaub



Write for EMULSIVE

The driving force behind EMULSIVE is knowledge transfer, specifically creating more of it in the film photography community. You can help by contributing your thoughts, work and ideas to inspire others reading these pages.

Take action and help drive an open, collaborative community: all you need do is read this and then drop me a line.



Lend your support

Like what you see here? You can support EMULSIVE by helping to contribute to the community voice on this website (see above), or by heading on over to the EMULSIVE Patreon page and considering financial support from as little as $2 a month.

As if that’s not enough, there’s also an EMULSIVE print and apparel store over at Society 6, currently showcasing over two dozen t-shirt designs and over a dozen unique prints of photographs made by yours truly

In short, I want to continue building this platform and I’d love your help to make that happen.

About The Author

Stephen Schaub

Stephen Schaub is an artist, inventor, teacher and revolutionary whose artworks have been featured throughout the United States and abroad. He is the founder of , which since 2006 has promoted film and hybrid photographic techniques. He has done product testing for most major photographic companies and was one of Polaroid's featured artists.


Comments are welcomed and encouraged on EMULSIVE but there are some instances where comments will deleted, and authors of those comments banned. They are as follows:

  • Comments deemed to be spam or solely promotional in nature will be deleted. Including a link to relevant content is permitted, but comments should be relevant to the topic at hand.
  • Comments including profanity, containing language or concepts that could be deemed offensive will be deleted. Note this may include abusive, threatening, pornographic, offensive, misleading or libelous language.
  • Comments that attack an individual directly will be deleted, as will comments that harass other contributing authors. In short, please be respectful toward others.



  1. Hi Stephen, great stuff. Thank you very much for this review. W

  2. thanks very much for the detail in this post Stephen. It was very interesting how you explained the contrast control you can get whilst processing, using the different temperatures and agitations. I didn’t expect a monobath to give you any control over developing.

  3. @CineStillFilm @stephenschaub Very , very interesting stuff …

  4. Does Stephen have any preferred methods/recommendations/tips & tricks for using Df96 with 4×5 sheet film?

    • Stephen Schaub

      Hello Mark, I used the MOD54 4×5 “reel” in a Paterson tank for the Portrait on TXP included in the sample images using the exact agitation technique outlined here and it worked perfectly. Happy shooting!

  5. @CineStillFilm @stephenschaub Love the insights here!



  1. Review: Comparing FF No.1 and Cinestill Df96 monobath developers « EMULSIVE - […] a quick aside, Stephen Schaub recently expertly covered Cinestill’s Df96 here on EMULSIVE and I encourage you to check…

Add your voice to the discussion

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Find out how you can help support EMULSIVE from as little as $2 a month on Patreon.Learn more