Film Comparison: Bergger Pancro 400, JCH Streetpan 400 and Rollei RPX 400 by Rebecca Joyce
The past 15 years or so have not been easy for film photographers: Most photo labs have closed their doors, major brands no longer manufacture analog cameras, and the few remaining repair shops are all but out of parts.
The biggest heartbreak of all, though, is the extinction of several film stocks: Infrared, Kodachrome, Ektachrome, Neopan 1600, and Kodak Royal Gold, to name a few. But for those of us sticking it out, we are seeing a renewed interest in analog photography. Our patience is being handsomely rewarded with new and re-released films to enjoy.
Fujifilm Neopan 400 was one of my favourite films, and the stash in my fridge is starting to look bare. So I set out to compare three new ISO 400 black and white films: Japan Camera Hunter Streetpan 400 (a re-release of an AGFA film), Bergger Pancro 400 (a completely new film), and Rollei RPX 400, which has been around since about 2011. They join ILFORD HP5+, ILFORD Delta 400 Professional, Kodak Tri-X 400, and Kodak T-MAX in a very popular film type, where it never hurts to have more choices.
Here’s what I cover in this article:
Table of contents
All three rolls were shot through a Canon EOS-3 with an older 28-70 f/2.8 lens, on the same day, in the same two places (Hollywood and Downtown Los Angeles).
As a custom function of the EOS-3, the film can be rewound, leaving some of the leader outside the cartridge. This makes for very easy re-loading of a partially exposed roll. Because of this, I was able to use the exact same camera and lens combination to shoot with all three rolls of film. I shot five frames at a time with each roll and then changed it out. By shooting on the same day, I could be sure the lighting conditions were the same. I managed not to make any unintended double exposures but did have some light leak at the beginning of the roll of JCH Street Pan, a reminder to load film in subdued light in the case of a faulty light trap on the canister.
I shot all rolls at EI 400 and tried to maintain consistent exposures by selecting two shutter speeds—one metered for the shadows, the other for highlights—and switching between the two, keeping the aperture at f/4.0.
They were each developed in a fresh batch of Rodinal. The instructions for Bergger Pancro 400 suggested extra fixing time (6 minutes), but I already fix all film for about 7 minutes to avoid purple negatives.
*Note: While I’d love to say the scratches are an intentional touch of flair, they’re the result of a battle with my metal reels that I clearly lost. In my defense, it was unusually humid during the latest heat wave here in Los Angeles and my hands were very sweaty, making them stick to the inside of my changing bag. It took several tries to get the film loaded, and I expected some scratches, but the film looks like I put it through the wash with a bagful of nails.
Each of the three sets below is presented as a mini-gallery. To view the images in full screen, click or tap one of the images.
Exposed for shadows
The images below were all exposed for the shadow areas to compare highlight retention. I found that JCH Streetpan 400 had the least detail in the highlight areas, while Bergger Pancro 400 still showed plenty of detail on the black speckled terrazzo of the Hollywood Walk of Fame.
Click on the thumbnails for a fullscreen gallery.
The next set of images below were exposed for the shadows in backlit situations. I tried to include the sun, or a reflection of it, in the frame. Much like the first set, Bergger Pancro 400 seems best at retaining detail in the highlights, in this case the sky. But in general, Pancro looks to be almost a stop underexposed, despite using the same exposure settings as the other two film stocks.
Exposing for midtone
This final set of images were exposed for a midtone and were all using the same exposure settings. While the angles are slightly different, they were also taken at the same intersection so that the tones could be compared.
It has became clear to me that Bergger Pancro should probably be shot at ISO 200 or 250, but it appears to have the least contrast.
In a final image it isn’t always desirable to have low contrast, but in this case I think it will provide the most flexibility for adding selective contrast in the printing process.
Japan Camera Hunter’s Streetpan has by far the most contrast of these three films, often losing detail in the brightest areas, but has very nice mid and dark tones. Rollei RPX 400 has a very bright, airy quality, and good, balanced contrast.
My personal favourite of the three is Streetpan 400, as it has a similar contrasty look to Fujifilm Neopan 400.
Thanks for reading.
~ Rebecca Joyce
Write for EMULSIVE
EMULSIVE NEEDS YOU. The driving force behind EMULSIVE is knowledge transfer, specifically creating more of it in the film photography community. You can help by contributing your thoughts, work and ideas to inspire others reading these pages.
To take action and help drive an open, collaborative community all you need do is read this and then drop me a line.
Lend your support to EMULSIVE
Like what you see here? You can support EMULSIVE by helping to contribute to the community voice on this website (see above), or by heading on over to the EMULSIVE Patreon page and considering financial support from as little as $2 a month.
As if that’s not enough, there’s also an EMULSIVE print and apparel store over at Society 6, currently showcasing over two dozen t-shirt designs and over a dozen unique prints of photographs made by yours truly
In short, I want to continue building this platform and I’d love your help to make that happen.