Select Page

A word on: Cinestill 800T (35mm) – by Phil HarrisonA word on: Cinestill 800T (35mm) – by Phil Harrison

A word on: Cinestill 800T (35mm) – by Phil Harrison

I thought CineStillFilm 800T would be a fun film to try and used my Leica M2 and Summarit-M 50mm f2.5 lens (with lens hood) to shoot a roll in and around the Manchester Art Museum, Rylands Library and the surrounds.

I thought these locations would be ideal for low level, mixed artificial light photography. For the indoors aspect, I rated the film at EI 800. For the outdoors element, I rated at the film at EI 500, exposing for shadow detail. I should not that for all my daylight photography I used a Wratten 85C gel filter (should have been an 85B but I had a C to hand).

I don’t home process, so the film was developed in C41 and scanned at the lab. As I see it, a big problem with ConeStill 800T is the loss of the anti halation rem-jet backing, as graphically demonstrated in my photo of the Rylands Library reading room below. It perfectly exhibits 800T’s unique halation effect.

Rylands Library reading room

Rylands Library reading room

The art museum photos also have halation in differing degrees. The photo of the people using their phones has a pale halation, yet the photo with the picture frames and dark blue wall has a serious halation from a window on the left.

Completely unpredictable!

Manchester Art Museum

Manchester Art Museum

Manchester Art Museum

Manchester Art Museum

Despite the halation the film managed mixed interior lighting well. Exterior photography was quite successful too, but the film is not suitable for sunny days due to those halation problems. When conditions were ideal the film was excellent, as shown in my photos of the couple by the river and the close up of the Bentley car suspension.

Couple by stream

Couple by stream

Bentley suspension

Bentley suspension

An item of note is that underexposed shadows had a purple hue. If the film had its anti halation backing, it would be excellent; the grain is very fine, the definition excellent. I could enlarge the image hugely and still retain fine detail.

Leaving halation to one side for a moment, the film has a very pleasant palette of colours with lovely skin tones and is not over saturated.

People from the Lomography school of photography looking for unpredictable and arty effects will love this film. I thoroughly enjoyed my roll of 800T but I will be staying with my favourite colour neg film, Kodak Portra 160, itself derived from Kodak’s motion picture films.

~ Phil Harrison



Write for EMULSIVE

The driving force behind EMULSIVE is knowledge transfer, specifically creating more of it in the film photography community. You can help by contributing your thoughts, work and ideas to inspire others reading these pages.

Take action and help drive an open, collaborative community: all you need do is read this and then drop me a line.



Lend your support

Like what you see here? You can support EMULSIVE by helping to contribute to the community voice on this website (see above), or by heading on over to the EMULSIVE Patreon page and considering financial support from as little as $2 a month.

As if that’s not enough, there’s also an EMULSIVE print and apparel store over at Society 6, currently showcasing over two dozen t-shirt designs and over a dozen unique prints of photographs made by yours truly

In short, I want to continue building this platform and I’d love your help to make that happen.



About The Author

Philip Harrison

Phil spent 25 years as a professional photographer after leaving Photographic College in the mid 1970’s. In his early years, he worked as a medical photographer, based in a hospital in the north of the UK and later came upon a change of direction to industrial photography and film/TV production. In the late 90’s Phil gave up professional photography and trained as a Train Guard, retiring a few years ago. He mainly uses "standard" lenses (50mm/80mm/150mm depending on format) with his cameras. He feels this makes him work harder and the resultant images are better. He doesn't specialise with his photography, enjoying photographing anything that appeals.


Comments are welcomed and encouraged on EMULSIVE but there are some instances where comments will deleted, and authors of those comments banned. They are as follows:

  • Comments deemed to be spam or solely promotional in nature will be deleted. Including a link to relevant content is permitted, but comments should be relevant to the topic at hand.
  • Comments including profanity, containing language or concepts that could be deemed offensive will be deleted. Note this may include abusive, threatening, pornographic, offensive, misleading or libelous language.
  • Comments that attack an individual directly will be deleted, as will comments that harass other contributing authors. In short, please be respectful toward others.



  1. I find the halation is pretty much the point of the film. It’s great for cityscapes at night.

    The other problem that I find is the film is very prone to electrostatic discharge, so I need to be more deliberate on the film advance.

  2. I love the look of the film but I’ve had some quality issues with the alpha film in 120. Don’t mind the halos.

  3. Hmmm mixed thoughts there. I would not shoot it outdoors until evening personally


Add your voice to the discussion

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Find out how you can help support EMULSIVE from as little as $2 a month on Patreon.Learn more