My first roll of… 35mm film: Lomography CN 400 + the Lomography SuperSampler – by Dimitri

Written by and published on .

In the ’90s and ’80s, everyone shot film. I was barely walking back then and could comfortably fit under a kitchen table standing upright. My dad owned a couple of cameras, so did my grandma and grandpa. I have a few negatives and lots of small prints from that era. But it wouldn’t be fair to count any of that work towards my own “first” roll.

Photography wasn’t a thing for me until I got my first digital point-and-shoot, once they became affordable – which was around the same time flip phones were all the rage. A decade later, I met my wife-to-be. She suggested we visit a Lomography store to try something new.

It was a toy store for young adults—shiny plastic boxes of various colours under the glass. Photo books full of saturated scans alongside each camera. Opposite the cash register, an entire wall, dedicated to hundreds of small prints, towered over the relatively large, well-lit store space. Smack in the middle of Toronto’s hipster central.

Back then, my mind was free of the nonsense that comes with spending too much time around great cameras. I cared not for the depth of field, sharpness, or feel in hand. The trends didn’t matter either; I was clueless. I just wanted to try something new, unique and have fun doing it with my girlfriend. Once the time came to choose, I picked one of the whackiest plastic machines on display: Lomography SuperSampler.

A week later, I got the results. Surprise: it worked! Most shots were over- or under-exposed, as expected: the camera has no way to control the shutter speed or aperture. For my sake, it was a good thing: back then, I’d probably ruin most shots given a chance to adjust any of the settings. Thankfully, the film’s forgiving latitude let me keep most of the frames; digital image editing made virtual push/pull a breeze. There’s a massive amount of grain, and given the age of the negative combined with inadequate storage, today’s scans also got scratches. Still, the gimmicky frame layout, along with f/11’s “focus everywhere” was enough to please and delight. It all just worked.

SuperSampler is not a versatile camera. The thing wouldn’t expose indoors. The “strips” prevented it from being a camera that’s good for most occasions. Eventually, something snapped, and the plastic box broke.

I’m thankful for my reintroduction to the creative medium that today drives me to process my emotions and share my stories. Though the first touchpoint seems to have misled me to believe that analogue cameras are fun yet less capable than the modern digital “standard.”

The true potential of film didn’t click with me until years later. For the most part, I thought of it as a creative effect, to be used sparingly along with my digital workflow. With time, however, I got frustrated with chasing megapixels. Resolution and clarity were never enough; the process felt broken. So I gave film a second chance, hoping to gain some artistic freedom. In turn, it led to an obsession, characterized by chronic bulging pocket and the annoying “wait for me!” on every stroll with family and friends.

The journey’s far from over. I still remember the days when I thought of photographers as “lazy” creatives; “all one needs to do is press a button!” There’s lots to learn.

~ Dimitri

Want to share your first roll or sheet of film?

Poorly exposed, badly framed and blurry photos? No-one is perfect, especially when shooting their first roll of film...but that's ok and I'd like to spread that message. Submit as many frames from your first roll as you're able to with an accompanying text of at least 500 words using this Google form. If you would prefer to submit another way, please use the contact link at the top of the page.

Share your knowledge, story or project

At the heart of EMULSIVE is the concept of helping promote the transfer of knowledge across the film photography community. You can support this goal by contributing your thoughts, work, experiences and ideas to inspire the hundreds of thousands of people who read these pages each month. Check out the submission guide here.

If you like what you're reading you can also help this personal passion project by heading on over to the EMULSIVE Patreon page and giving as little as a dollar a month. There's also print and apparel over at Society 6, currently showcasing over two dozen t-shirt designs and over a dozen unique photographs available for purchase.

More related reading

Five years of EMULSIVE – a retrospective

It’s been 5 years since I launched EMULSIVE – half a decade — during that time, the landscape of the film photography community has changed ... Read moreFive years of EMULSIVE – a retrospective
Month in review: August 2020

Month in review: August 2020

These are the 31 days and 34 articles that made EMULSIVE in August 2020. As usual, you’ll find a recap of all the articles published, ... Read moreMonth in review: August 2020
Cover - Never forget, Craig Pindell - September 11 2008

Photostory: Never Forget 2008 – by Craig Pindell

Once again and with his kind permission, I’m posting one of Craig Pindell’s Never Forget series of photographs and his words in remembrance of the attack on ... Read morePhotostory: Never Forget 2008 – by Craig Pindell
Month in review: July 2020

Month in review: July 2020

These are the 31 days and 33 articles that made EMULSIVE in July 2020. As usual, you’ll find a recap of all the articles published, ... Read moreMonth in review: July 2020

5 Frames… Of unperforated Agfa ASP 400S with a Voigtlander Vito (EI 400 / 35mm Format) – by Tobias Eriksson

5 Frames… From a Hasselblad XPan on Fujifilm Velvia 100 – by Nick Orloff


1 thought on “My first roll of… 35mm film: Lomography CN 400 + the Lomography SuperSampler – by Dimitri”

Join the discussion