Hello again, EMULSIVE readers. It’s been a while since I did one of these (having looked back through Lightroom, my last images were taken some 7 weeks ago at the time of writing), as life seems to keep getting in the way of my creativity.
Feeling a little cooped up I was definitely eager to head out with the camera again. So I grabbed a new film for me, Ilford Delta 400 Professional and headed out for my favourite woodland. I also took Delta 100 Professional with me, as I wasn’t 100% of what weather to expect but never shot it…good job too, for reasons I’m getting to.
I always love heading to this particular patch of woodland (I haven’t written an article on this place before) as it often inspires me, or has changed since my last visit. There is a lot of forestry work going on – taking out older trees for newer ones, as well as clearing and tidying of the paths – which opens up further possibilities. You also never know what you are going to see and to date, I have encountered many deer, rabbits, and a rather confused looking owl, which makes each visit worthwhile.
Given my recent time away from the camera it seemed like the perfect place to head to get back in the groove. The weather was glorious; a nice sunny day, with a few clouds in the sky. Being woodland (and quite dark in places) I opted for the 400 over the 100 as there was a bit of a breeze and I wanted to avoid any motion blur on the trees.
The shoot went well, there were some lovely clouds above the tree line, some recently cut logs, as well as branches gathered into small bundles, all making for some lovely imagery. Despite my time away from the camera, I felt inspired once again.
Shoot over, I headed back to the darkroom, and processed the film. The film was shot at box speed, and I used Ilford DD-X (1+4, 8 mins at 20c) as my developer. My Ilford Ilfostop has ran out, so I am now using Fotospeed SB50 as my stop bath, and Fotospeed FX30 for the fixer. As mentioned in my last article, I have nothing against the Ilford Stop Bath / Fixers I have used in the past, the Fotospeed chemicals were simply much cheaper.
It was at this point disaster struck…
Being honest, I had initially thought about not publishing this article, as I want to showcase the best of my year finding film. Many photographers may argue that sharing the ups and downs of photography is good practice, and can only help the community. Yet many I follow online are less transparent, using their online presence as a highlight reel, simply showcasing the best of their work.
Whilst I am not criticising for this (far from it, whatever works for you), the teacher inside me twisted my arm into writing the article; after all, I encourage my students to learn from their mistakes, just like I have had to do on this occasion. So warts and all, here goes.
I loaded the film fine, no reel problems there (sorry, I’m not sorry for making that pun). I put the lid on the developing tank and turned round for the light switch…to see light flooding into the darkroom from behind me.
*insert several creative expletives here*
You see, whilst I built my darkroom myself, it is far from perfect. To prevent light coming in through the door, there is a piece of cardboard covering the glass pane in the door. This is gaffer taped to the door, and covered in blackout blind material, which is also taped to the door. The lock is also dual-covered, in a similar format.
It looks a little like this:
However, the gaffer tape on the glass pane had come loose, letting light through the edges of the covered area. At the same time, the foot of the door was also letting in light, as it had slipped slightly over the winter.
The black strip designed to keep the door light-tight had also failed, allowing light to leak in.
Whilst the room was not light enough for me to see, there was an alarming amount of light coming through the door. I decided to process the film regardless, hoping that the damage was minimal. The rest of the development process went well, and the film dried well, with no curl.
The scanner did not like the film one bit. All-bar-one of the 12 images mis-scanned, chopping sections of the film away.
The image above was at the beginning of the roll, and the light leaks appear to have almost destroyed the image.
The scanner continued to mis-scan the frames, despite many re-attempts at the process.
Even despite tweaking the settings, and setting the scanning area to large, this did not rectify the problem, only adding the edge of the film in with the rest of the failed image.
The last image on the roll was the least ruined of the 12, however the light leaks had still managed to ruin a good 80-85% of the image. Only the far right hand side of the image is a true reflection of the light/contrast of the film, and even then I am not sure how accurate that is.
Am I disappointed? Very.
Some of the images I was really pleased with, and the light leaks have totally ruined my planned article. I am also annoyed as I have a limited supply of Ilford Delta, and it is one of the more expensive films I am testing.
This has made me very frustrated as I feel I could have prevented the issue.
TLDR; things didn’t quite go to plan on this one. However, rather than try to bury my mistake, I decided to be transparent on the issue. I see this as a learning opportunity, and hope that this article can stop someone else making the same silly mistake I have made.
The door has now been fixed, and as a result I now have another step in my development process (check the door is fully light tight). I have also started using a spare panel of wood to cover the door as a third measure of light prevention, in addition to cardboard and blackout blind material. If this doesn’t work, I’ll have to start developing at night time!
I will return with a proper review of Ilford Delta Professional later in the year. In the meantime, the sun is beginning to be out on a regular basis, so it is time for some infrared photography.
You can keep up to date with the films I cover in this series by following the links below:
- Finding Film part 15: Fomapan 400 Action
- Finding Film part fourteen: Bergger Pancro 400
- Finding Film part 13: ILFORD HP5 PLUS
- Finding Film part 12: Ilford Delta 100 and 400 Professional
- Finding film part 11: ILFORD SFX 200
- Finding Film part 10: Rollin’ Rollei Retro 80S and 400S
- Finding Film part 9: Fumbling Fuji NEOPAN Acros 100
- Finding Film part 8: Getting to know my Lady Gray 400
- Finding film part 7: Let there be light AKA a disaster with Delta
- Finding film part 6: taking it slow with ILFORD Pan F Plus
- Finding film part 5: All GAS-ed up and time for T-MAX 400
- Finding film part 4: ILFORD FP4+ strikes back
- Finding film part 3: Czeching out Fomapan
- Finding film part 2: expanding my horizons with Kodak Tri-X 400, Rodinal and Ilford DD-X
- Finding Film part 1: experiences so far
~ Tom Rayfield
Write for EMULSIVE
The driving force behind EMULSIVE is knowledge transfer, specifically creating more of it in the film photography community. You can help by contributing your thoughts, work and ideas to inspire others reading these pages.
Take action and help drive an open, collaborative community: all you need do is read this and then drop me a line.
Lend your support
Like what you see here? You can support EMULSIVE by helping to contribute to the community voice on this website (see above), or by heading on over to the EMULSIVE Patreon page and adding financial support from as little as $2 a month.
As if that’s not enough, there’s also an EMULSIVE print and apparel store over at Society 6, currently showcasing over two dozen t-shirt designs and over a dozen unique prints of photographs made by yours truly.